Smith v. Johns

Respondent: Brock Johns
Movant: Scott W Smith
Case Number: 5:2011cv00011
Filed: January 5, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Stephens
Presiding Judge: Bana Roberts
Presiding Judge: Lee R. West
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2012 Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; 20 the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation; DENIES as MOOT Smith's challenges to his placement on MSR and to the conditions of his release; and DISMISSES w/o prej to refiling all other claims asserted by Smith in this matter. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 1/5/12. (ap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Johns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Scott W Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brock Johns
Represented By: Robert A Bradford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?