Agrawal v. Lahood
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 13, 2013
ORDER denying 92 plaintiff's Motion for New Trial (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 3/13/2013. (ks)
|September 25, 2012
ORDER granting 55 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment in Employment Discrimination Case (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 9/25/2012. (ks)
|June 25, 2012
ORDER denying 27 plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery, granting 26 defendant's Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery, and ordering plaintiff to respond to defendant's interrogatories and requests for p roduction by June 29, 2012. Additionally, the Court sanctions plaintiff's counsel for his conduct in relation to this discovery matter and orders him to pay for the reasonable expenses incurred by defendant, including attorney's fees, in preparing the motion (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 6/25/2012. (ks)
|November 3, 2011
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 defendant's Motion to Dismiss as follows: (A) The Court grants the motion to dismiss as to any claims in addition to those seven discrete promotions which were accepted for investigation by the EEO C and fully exhausted through that process, and (B) The Court denies the motion to dismiss in all other respects. Additionally, the Court directs plaintiff to serve the United States Attorney for the Western District of Oklahoma by November 15, 2011 (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 11/3/2011. (ks)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?