Berry v. Maschhoffs Inc The
Plaintiff: Todd Berry
Defendant: Maschhoffs Inc The
Case Number: 5:2011cv00762
Filed: July 7, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Robin J. Cauthron
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying 7 Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement; granting 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Dismissal Without Prejudice of Second Cause of Action; denying 11 Plainiff's Motion to Remand. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 11/1/11. (lg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry v. Maschhoffs Inc The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Todd Berry
Represented By: Raymond A Vincent
Represented By: Ted N Pool
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maschhoffs Inc The
Represented By: Andrew R Chilson
Represented By: Robert J Haupt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?