Holmes v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Michelle Lee Holmes
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 5:2011cv00838
Filed: July 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Custer
Presiding Judge: Bana Roberts
Presiding Judge: Lee R. West
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; the Court ADOPTS the 14 Report and Recommendation; REVERSES the Commr's decision denying Holmes' Application for Supp Sec Income; REMANDS this matter to the Commr; ORDERS that judgment pursuant to this Order issue forthwith. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 4/19/12. (ap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holmes v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Lee Holmes
Represented By: James R Linehan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By: Michael A Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?