Joint Technology Inc v. Weaver et al
Plaintiff: Joint Technology Inc
Defendant: Weaver Medical Group Inc and Gary Kent Weaver, Jr
Case Number: 5:2011cv00846
Filed: July 26, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Vicki Miles-LaGrange
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER denying 135 plaintiff's Rule 30 Motion for Sanctions (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 2/21/2014. (ks)
January 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER denying as premature 84 plaintiff Joint Technology, Inc. d/b/a Revert Systems' Application for Order in Aid of Discovery and Sanctions (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 1/30/2013. (ks)
January 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER granting 76 defendant Gary Kent Weaver, Jr.'s motion for partial summary judgment. Specifically, the Court finds that Weaver is entitled to summary judgment as to Joint's claims for breach of exclusivity, breach of non-solicitation covenant prior to termination, and breach of non-solicitation covenant after termination (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 1/23/2013. (ks)
March 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 plaintiff Joint Technology, Inc. and third party defendant Jim Patton's motion to dismiss (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 3/14/2012. (ks)
December 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 third-party defendant Jim Patton's Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Action (as more fully set out in the Order). Finally, the Court finds Weaver's request for leave to amend and Patton's motion to dismiss Weaver's claim for accounting are MOOT. Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 12/29/2011. (njr)
October 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting 8 Weaver Medical's motion to dismiss and dismissing all claims against Weaver Medical. Further, the Court denies plaintiff's request to sever claims against Weaver Medical as moot (as more fully set out in order). signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 10/4/2011. (ks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joint Technology Inc v. Weaver et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weaver Medical Group Inc
Represented By: Jaclynn R Loney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Kent Weaver, Jr
Represented By: Jaclynn R Loney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joint Technology Inc
Represented By: Paul E Quigley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?