Seamster v. Prater et al
| Willie L Seamster |
| David W Prater, Virgil Black, Vicki L Robertson, Kenneth Watson, Matt Dillon, Lieutenant Patton, Sergeant Sharp, Sergeant Dale, Sergeant Marston, Sergeant Blankenship, Nathan Davis, Rey Vasquez, Officer Dake and Officer Sweeney |
| 5:2011cv01383 |
| November 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Comanche |
| Lee R. West |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 10 Report and Recommendation; DISMISSES w/prej all claims agst dfts Black, Robertson, Watson, Prater and Dillion; DISMISSES w/prej all claims agst dfts Patton, Sharp, Dale, Marston, Blankenship, Vasquez, Dake, Sweeney and Davis that arise fm their testimony during Seamster's criminal prcdgs; DISMISSES w/o prej allegations in Seamster's complaint re allegedly unlawful arrest and convictions; DISMISSES w/prej allegations in supp of his claim under sect 1983; DISMISSES w/o prej allegations dfts conspired agst him; FINDS Seamster's req for reversal of all charges and his challenges to his terms of imprisonment are properly considered under sect 2254; FINDS dism of Seamster's complaint shall count as one "strike" pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 1/19/12. (ap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
