Coddington v. Workman
Petitioner: James Coddington
Respondent: Randall G Workman
Case Number: 5:2011cv01457
Filed: December 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Pittsburg
Presiding Judge: Robin J. Cauthron
Presiding Judge: Gary M. Purcell
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OPINION having concluded petitioner's arguments do not establish a right to relief, his petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, as are his requests for discovery and an evidentiary hearing 29 , 30 and 31 ; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 9/15/2016. (cla)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coddington v. Workman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Coddington
Represented By: Susanna M Gattoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randall G Workman
Represented By: Seth S Branham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?