Dopp v. Jones et al
| Richard L Dopp |
| Drew Edmondson, Sgt Nicholson, Margaret Green, Sgt McManus, Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randy Knight, Alecia Maddox, Kara Johnson, Randall Workman, David Orman, John Marlar, Chester Mason, Genese McCoy, Debbie Morton, Bob Compton, Dr Sockey, Terry Crenshaw, Linda Morgan, Ed Evans and Ronald Anderson |
| 5:2011cv01495 |
| December 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Pittsburg |
| Timothy D. DeGiusti |
| Gary M. Purcell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 38 Motion to File Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 4/9/2014. (mb)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 32 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; striking 33 Motion for New Trial; striking 33 Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 1/30/2014. (mb)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re Supplemental R&R 22 ; the Second Amended Compl 19 is DISMISSED w/o prej; all pending mtns 28 , 29 , 21 , 27 , 26 are DENIED. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 3/20/13. (ap)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 2 Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Richard L Dopp. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 1/31/2012. (cjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
