Lane v. Chester
Petitioner: Michael Brandon Lane
Respondent: Claude Chester
Case Number: 5:2012cv00137
Filed: February 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Comanche
Presiding Judge: Valerie K. Couch
Presiding Judge: Joe Heaton
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 of Magistrate Judge Gary Purcell...petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus under §2244 is denied...additionally the court concludes petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right...he is denied a certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 12/20/2012. (lam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lane v. Chester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Brandon Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Claude Chester
Represented By: Ashley L Little
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?