Harper v. Rudek et al
| Dale E Harper |
| Warden Chester, John Doe, Nina Nagel-Silva, Officer Stoinsky, Sergeant Bearden, Mr Ainsworth, Sgt Brashears and James Rudek |
| 5:2012cv00449 |
| April 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Comanche |
| Joe Heaton |
| Bana Roberts |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 70 of Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell...plaintiff's claims against defendants Nina Nagel-Silva and Tracy McCollum are dismissed unless within 14 days plaintiff demonstrates to the court that the disciplinary conviction on which plaintiff bases his retaliation claims has been invalidated. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 11/06/2013. (lam)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 82 of Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell and denies plaintiff's motions 75 and 78 requesting entry of default and default judgment; the court grants plaintiff an additional 20 day within which to respond to defendants motion to dismiss 70 ...plaintiff's response is due 06/27/2013. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 06/07/2013. (lam)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 67 , 68 and 69 of Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell...and dismisses plaintiff's claims against defendants Rudek, Brashears and Stoinsky without prejudice; plaintiff's motion requesting an extens ion of time to serve Brashears and Stoinsky 71 is denied as moot; the court also grants summary judgment in favor of defendant Bearden on the claim alleged against him in count 2 of the complaint and grants summary judgment in favor of defendant Ai nsworth on the claim alleged against him in count 3 and dismisses without prejudice the claims alleged against defendant Bearden, Ainsworth and Chester in counts 4 and 5; plaintiff's motion to compel 59 and defendants' motion for protective order 43 are denied as moot.. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 04/17/2013. (lam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
