Oklahoma State of v. Pyramid Diversified Services Inc
Plaintiff: Oklahoma State of
Defendant: Pyramid Diversified Services Inc
Counter_claimant: Pyramid Diversified Services Inc
Counter_defendant: Oklahoma State of
Case Number: 5:2012cv00457
Filed: April 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Joe Heaton
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER consolidating for all purposes CIV-09-0622-HE and CIV-12-0457-HE...CIV-09-0622-HE is the surviving case and any future filings shall be under that number; Pyramid's motion to alter judgment 89 and 107 are denied; Receiver's motion to amend/correct judgment 95 is granted in part and denied in part; Receiver's motion for hearing 118 is denied; Receiver's motion for attorney's fees 92 is denied; parties are directed to submit a joint proposed judgment within 10 days that reflects the court's decision that the Receiver can recover IBNR reserves plus interest for the 2006 and 2007 policy years. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 04/21/2014. (lam)
November 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER granting Receiver's motion for summary judgment 61 ; PDS's motion motion for summary judgment 63 is denied; PDS's motion to exclude testimony of the Receiver's expert witness 60 is denied as moot; Receiver's motion to amend 54 is denied; Receiver and PDS are directed to submit a joint proposed judgment within 10 days that reflects the court's resolution of all issues; see order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 11/14/2013.(lam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oklahoma State of v. Pyramid Diversified Services Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oklahoma State of
Represented By: Christopher S Thrutchley
Represented By: Gregory P Reilly
Represented By: William W O'Connor
Represented By: John Michael O'Connor
Represented By: Keith A Wilkes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pyramid Diversified Services Inc
Represented By: Robert C Byerts
Represented By: Kenneth A Tillotson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Pyramid Diversified Services Inc
Represented By: Robert C Byerts
Represented By: Kenneth A Tillotson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Oklahoma State of
Represented By: John Michael O'Connor
Represented By: William W O'Connor
Represented By: Gregory P Reilly
Represented By: Christopher S Thrutchley
Represented By: Keith A Wilkes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?