Robaczynski v. McClendon et al
Stephen Robaczynski |
Aubrey K McClendon, Richard K Davidson, Kathleen M Eisbrenner, Burns Hargis, Frank Keating, Charles T Maxwell, Merrill A Miller, Jr, Don Nickles, Lou Simpson and Chesapeake Energy Corporation |
5:2012cv00501 |
May 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Vicki Miles-LaGrange |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER denying Dolezal's Motion to Consolidate Cases and to Appoint Lead Counsel Structure [docket no. 7 in Case No. CIV-12-477-M], denying the Initial Mallow Group's Cross-Motion to Consolidate All Related Cases and to Appoint Lead Counsel [docket no. 15 in Case No. CIV-12-436-M], denying Erickson's Motion to Consolidate and Appoint Lead Counsel [docket no. 15 in Case No. CIV-12-631-M], and granting in part and denying in part Shochat's Cross-Motion for Consolidation of Relat ed Cases and Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel [docket no. 7 in Case No. CIV-12-488-M] as follows: the Court grants Shochat's crossmotion for consolidation of related cases and appointment of lead counsel and denies Shochat's motion for appointment of lead plaintiff. The Court will issue a separate order consolidating the related cases and appointing lead counsel (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 7/13/2012. (ks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.