Collins v. Lawson et al
Tonya Collins |
Katie Lawson, John Whetsel, Colleen Fickel and Audrey M Reiber |
5:2012cv00819 |
July 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Oklahoma |
Lee R. West |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER re 38 Order. The Court FINDS that Collins has complied with the Court's Order of November 29,2012; and REMINDS Lawson that her deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the allegations in the complaint is fourteen (14) days from the date Collins filed proof of payment. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 12/18/12. (kw, ) |
Filing 42 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss. DENIES the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint 19 filed on October 12, 2012, by Fickel, in her individual and official capacities, and R Reiber on behalf of Reiber, individually, to th e extent that these defendants have sought dismissal of the complaint due to Collins' failure to prepay these defendants for all legal fees and costs reasonably incurred by Fickel and Reiber in litigating Collins II; and GRANTS said motion to th e extent that Fickel in her official capacity has sought dismissal of Collins' federal and state law claims against her and DISMISSES this action without prejudice against Fickel in her official capacity. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 12/17/12. (kw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.