Hanover American Insurance Company v. Saul et al
| Hanover American Insurance Company |
| Gregory A Saul, Debora K Balfour, Debora K Balfour Chiropractic PC and Matthew A Briner |
| 5:2012cv00922 |
| August 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joe Heaton |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER granting 46 plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to both its claim and defendant Balfour's counterclaims...motion is also granted as to Dr. Debora K. Balfour Chiropractic, PC which confessed it...plaintiff's claim against Saul, who was never served is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 08/27/2013. (lam)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER the court concludes on the record before it that there is no basis stated for recovery under the policy for the claims asserted against Balfour in the Briner lawsuit, or for concluding that NCMIC has a duty to defendant or indemnity Balfour in the state court action; Balfour has not stated a claim against NCMIC for breach of contract or bad faith upon which relief may be granted and NCMIC's motion 24 to dismiss is granted...the claims asserted by Balfour and Dr. Deborah K. Balfour Chriopractic, P.C. in their third party complaint against NCMIC are dismissed. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 03/05/2013. (lam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
