Craft v. Global Expertise in Outsourcing et al
| Louis Douglas Craft, Jr |
| Global Expertise in Outsourcing, FNU Plume and FNU Braziel |
| 5:2012cv01133 |
| October 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Comanche |
| Shon T. Erwin |
| David L. Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDER denying 128 Motion to Vacate ; denying as moot 130 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 134 Motion for Order; denying 134 Motion to Consolidate Cases; denying 135 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 136 Motion for Order; denying as moot 137 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 138 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 143 Motion to Supplement, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 10/4/16. (jw)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER denying 104 Motion for the Court Order and Judgment be Set Aside for Fraud and Misconduct;denying 105 Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings to Conform to Evidence; denying 107 Motion to Compel; denying 108 Motion for Leave to Stipulate and Supplement Plaintiff's Mtion to Compel, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 6/25/15. (jw)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 82 Motion for Order filed by Louis Douglas Craft, Jr, 62 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Louis Douglas Craft, Jr, 85 Motion for Protective Order filed by Global Expertise in Outsourcing, M ary Braziel, Michael Plume, 74 Report and Recommendation, 34 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by FNU Braziel, FNU Plume. Plaintiff filed a nondispositive motion contemporaneously with his Objection to the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 82] and Defendants responded with a motion for a protective order [Doc. No. 85]. Because the Court grants Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs remaining state-law claim, these motions are moot. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 9/19/14. (jw)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 14 Report and Recommendation, 3 Motion for TRO, Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Louis Douglas Craft, Jr. In accordance with the foregoing, the Report and Recommendation of the Magist rate Judge [Doc. No. 14] is ADOPTED as supplemented herein and Plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 3] is DENIED. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with the original Referral Order. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 12/18/12. (jw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
