Free v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
| Wesley D Free |
| Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Al Kelly |
| 5:2013cv00087 |
| January 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Woodward |
| Stephen P. Friot |
| Gary M. Purcell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING 31 Second Supplemental Report and Recommendation, DISMISSING w/o prejudice plf's cause of action against dft Al Kelly. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 1/30/14. (llg)
|
|
Filing
31
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that Plaintiffs cause of action against Defendant Kelly be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to effect timely service of process. Objections to R&R due by 2/13/2014. This S econd Supplemental Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter, and any pending motion not specifically addressed herein is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 1/24/2013. (brs)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 22 Supplemental Report and Recommendation. Plf's claims against dft Oklahoma Department of Corrections are DISMISSED w/prejudice pursuant to 28 USC § 1915A(b) on the ground of Eleventh Amendment immunity. This action remains referred. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 9/20/13. (llg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
