Choctaw Town Square LLC v. Choctaw Oklahoma City of et al
Plaintiff: Choctaw Town Square LLC
Defendant: Choctaw Oklahoma City of, Choctaw Utilities Authority The and BancFirst
Counter_claimant: Choctaw Utilities Authority The and Choctaw Oklahoma City of
Counter_defendant: Choctaw Town Square LLC
Case Number: 5:2013cv00118
Filed: February 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Choctaw Town Square LLC v. Choctaw Oklahoma City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Choctaw Utilities Authority The
Represented By: Matthew J Love
Represented By: Margaret McMorrow-Love
Represented By: Ted N Pool
Represented By: Raymond A Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Choctaw Oklahoma City of
Represented By: Matthew J Love
Represented By: Margaret McMorrow-Love
Represented By: Ted N Pool
Represented By: Raymond A Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Choctaw Town Square LLC
Represented By: Derrick Mark Davidson
Represented By: Kenneth Vaughn Knight
Represented By: Richard E Parrish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Choctaw Oklahoma City of
Represented By: Matthew J Love
Represented By: Margaret McMorrow-Love
Represented By: Ted N Pool
Represented By: Raymond A Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Choctaw Utilities Authority The
Represented By: Matthew J Love
Represented By: Margaret McMorrow-Love
Represented By: Ted N Pool
Represented By: Raymond A Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BancFirst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Choctaw Town Square LLC
Represented By: Derrick Mark Davidson
Represented By: Kenneth Vaughn Knight
Represented By: Richard E Parrish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?