Ross v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 25, 2015
Certificate of Appealability Denied re 86 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 8/25/15. (jw)
|June 18, 2015
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 75 Report and Recommendation. In accordance with the foregoing, the Court adopts the Report and recommendation, Doc. No. 75, to the extent it is consistent herewith. Plaintiffs claims against Defendan ts Addison, Preston, and Rose are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and Defendants Motion to Dismiss/Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 70, is GRANTED, based on the defense of qualified immunity, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 6/18/15. (jw)
|January 16, 2015
O RDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 62 Report and Recommendation, The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 62], as supplemented herein, to the extent it is consistent with this Order. Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. No. 60] is DENIED; Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration [Doc. No. 65] is DENIED; Robert Cotners motion to intervene [Doc. No. 66] is DENIED; and Defendants Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 48] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. If Plaintiff seeks to amend his Complaint, the Court grants him leave to do so by February 6, 2015, as more fully set out.Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 1/16/15. (jw)
|September 29, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 53 Report and Recommendation, In accordance with the foregoing, the Report and Recommendation of theMagistrate Judge is ADOPTED, as supplemented herein, and Defendants Motion toDismiss [Doc. No. 27] is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 9/29/14. (jw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?