Carroll et al v. Independent School District No 8 of Lawton et al
Ted Carroll and Bella Carroll |
Independent School District No 8 of Lawton, Vickie Cantrell, Lynn Fitz and John C Whittington |
5:2013cv00407 |
April 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Comanche |
Vicki Miles-LaGrange |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER granting 36 Defendant Lawton Public School's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, and 37 Defendant Vickie Cantrell's Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint as follows: (1) The Court dismisse s plaintiffs' Section 1983 claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice; and (2) The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' Oklahoma Constitution and negligence claims against the District and assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against Cantrell, and dismisses these claims without prejudice (as more fully set out). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 11/26/2014. (ks) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting 19 defendants' Lynn Fitz and John Whittington motion to dismiss and dismissing plaintiffs' negligence and civil conspiracy claims against defendants Fitz and Whittington (as more fully set out in order). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 3/26/2014. (ks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.