Neill et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company et al
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Neill and Alicia Neill
Defendant: State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and Jack Stout
Case Number: 5:2013cv00627
Filed: June 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Woodward
Presiding Judge: Timothy D. DeGiusti
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 156 Motion to Compel. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 1/13/17. (ml)
August 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 8/16/2016. (mb)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER granting 116 Motion to Stay Ruling on Discovery Motion Pending Ruling on Dispositive Motion. Ruling on Plaintiffs' pending discovery-related motions, 112 Motion to Compel Substitute Corporate Designee and Request for Costs and Fees and 115 Motion to Strike the Designation of Deposition Transcript of Kenneth Kwok As Confidential, is stayed until the Court decides 68 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 12/14/2015. (jb)
August 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER denying 100 sealed Motion. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 08/03/15. (wh)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER denying 31 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 37 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 12/12/14. (jw)
January 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying 7 Motion to Remand and Dismissing Defendant Jack Stout. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 1/21/2014. (mb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neill et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Neill
Represented By: Jeffrey D Marr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Neill
Represented By: Jeffrey D Marr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Represented By: Daniel C Andrews
Represented By: David V Jones
Represented By: Benjamin G Kemble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Stout
Represented By: Daniel C Andrews
Represented By: David V Jones
Represented By: Benjamin G Kemble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?