Southern Nazarene University et al v. Sebelius et al
| Mid-America Christian University, Oklahoma Baptist University, Oklahoma Wesleyan University and Southern Nazarene University |
| United States Department of Health and Human Services, Jacob J Lew, Thomas E Perez, Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of Labor and United States Department of the Treasury |
| 5:2013cv01015 |
| September 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Oklahoma |
| Stephen P. Friot |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 26 Motion to Dismiss to the extent that it seeks dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6). The defendants, their agents, officers, and employees, and all others in active concert or participatio n with them, Rule 65, Fed.R.Civ.P., are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from any effort to apply or enforce, as to plaintiffs, the substantive requirements imposed by 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a)(4) and at issue in this case, or the self-certification regulations related thereto, or any penalties, fines or assessments related thereto, until the further order of the court.. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 12/23/13. (kw, ) Modified on 12/23/2013 to correct docket text (kw, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
