Dease v. Barney et al
Plaintiff: William H Dease
Defendant: FNU Barney and S May
Case Number: 5:2014cv00673
Filed: June 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Presiding Judge: Suzanne Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER ADOPTING 66 Report and Recommendation; ADOPTING 67 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING (as set forth in detail in this order) 60 Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment filed by Ortiz, Rover Alverez, Marler, John Whetsel; DISMISSING without prejudice dfts S May, Lt Barney. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 12/15/15. (llg)
November 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING 29 Report and Recommendation, DENYING 32 Objection filed by William H Dease, DENYING 24 Motion for Order filed by William H Dease, DENYING 28 Motion for Order filed by William H Dease. This action remains referred to the magistrate judge. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 11/21/14. (llg)
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 8 Report and Recommendation, to the extent that it recommends dismissal of the complaint w/o prejudice in the event that plf fails to submit a completed IFP application or fails to pay the $400 filing fee. Plf's ti me for submitting either the $400 filing fee or a completed & otherwise satisfactory IFP application is EXTENDED to 21 days from this date. 10 Plaintiff's Objections to the Report are GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART. Plf's objectio ns are GRANTED but only to the ltd extent that addl time has now been provided for plf to pay the $400 filing fee or submit a completed IFP application. In all other respects, plf's objections are DENIED. 2 Application for Leave to Proce ed in forma pauperis filed by William H Dease will continue to pend; however, the application is insufficient as it now stands. 9 Motion to Compel filed by William H Dease is DENIED. Clerk is DIRECTED to send to plf 2 copies of this order, 2 copi es of doc. no. 2, & 2 copies of doc. no. 5. Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Sheriff John Whetsel w/a cover ltr directing his attn to the paragraph at the top of pg 3 of this order. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 9/9/14. (llg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dease v. Barney et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William H Dease
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU Barney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S May
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?