Roof et al v. Newcastle Public School et al
| Brandi Roof |
| Newcastle Public School and Jared Michael Feroli |
| 5:2014cv01123 |
| October 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| McClain |
| Joe Heaton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 31 the District's motion for summary judgment...as plaintiff's submissions are insufficient to create a justiciable question as to whether the District was deliberately indifferent, the District is entitled to summary judgment on the Title IX claim...the claims against Mr. Feroli remain for resolution. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 02/08/2016. (lam)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 3 the District's motion to dismiss 9 ; plaintiff's negligence and due process claims against the District are dismissed...her claim under Title IX remains for resolution; defendant Feroli's motion to dismiss 14 is s tricken as moot...the § 1983 and assault and battery claims against him remain for resolution; plaintiff has requested leave to further amend in the event some of her claims are dismissed; as some of the deficiencies noted could potentiall be cured by amendment plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint within 14 days. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 03/10/2015. (lam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
