Dixon v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners et al
Deanna Dixon |
Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners, Oklahoma County Juvenile Bureau, James Saffle, J Me Overstreet, Daniel Hansen, Karly Meadows and Vicki Cargill |
5:2015cv00196 |
February 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Oklahoma |
David L. Russell |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 ORDER denying 82 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 87 Motion to Review Taxation of Costs. and the decision of the Clerk is hereby Affirmed, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 2/3/17. (jw) |
Filing 78 ORDER granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 77 Motion for Default Judgment. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth above, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60) is hereby GRANTED. Defendants Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 77), which seeks summary judgment on the basis that their motion for summary judgment was not subjected to a response is granted to the extent it is consistent with the above. as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 11/17/16. (jw) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion for Summary Judgment by Board of County Commissioners; denying 47 Motion for Summary Judgment by individual Defendants, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 9/19/16. (jw) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 2/4/16. (jw) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to amend her allegations in a final attempt to comply with the relevant law. The deficiencies identified by the Court's Orders may not be the only deficiencies in the ple adings, and therefore, Plaintiff is admonished to consider carefully her pleading obligations. Plaintiff's second amended complaint shall be filed within fourteen days of entry of this Order, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 10/7/15. (jw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.