Dixon v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners et al
Plaintiff: Deanna Dixon
Defendant: Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners, Oklahoma County Juvenile Bureau, James Saffle, J Me Overstreet, Daniel Hansen, Karly Meadows and Vicki Cargill
Case Number: 5:2015cv00196
Filed: February 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: David L. Russell
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying 82 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 87 Motion to Review Taxation of Costs. and the decision of the Clerk is hereby Affirmed, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 2/3/17. (jw)
November 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 77 Motion for Default Judgment. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth above, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60) is hereby GRANTED. Defendants Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 77), which seeks summary judgment on the basis that their motion for summary judgment was not subjected to a response is granted to the extent it is consistent with the above. as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 11/17/16. (jw)
September 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion for Summary Judgment by Board of County Commissioners; denying 47 Motion for Summary Judgment by individual Defendants, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 9/19/16. (jw)
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 2/4/16. (jw)
October 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to amend her allegations in a final attempt to comply with the relevant law. The deficiencies identified by the Court's Orders may not be the only deficiencies in the ple adings, and therefore, Plaintiff is admonished to consider carefully her pleading obligations. Plaintiff's second amended complaint shall be filed within fourteen days of entry of this Order, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 10/7/15. (jw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Dixon
Represented By: Chanda R Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma County Juvenile Bureau
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Saffle
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Me Overstreet
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Hansen
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karly Meadows
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vicki Cargill
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Represented By: Lisa E Endres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?