Hill v. City of Oklahoma City et al
| Anthony Hill |
| City of Oklahoma City, Jeffery Coffey, Christopher Shubert, Austin Childs, Timothy Owens, Bill Citty and Oklahoma City Police Department |
| 5:2015cv00881 |
| August 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Oklahoma |
| Robin J. Cauthron |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Defendants' Motion to Strike Witness and Exhibits. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 11/9/17. (lg)
|
|
Filing
86
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 9/11/17. (lg)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER denying 37 OKC's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 9/6/17. (lg)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Coffey, Shubert, Childs, and Owens. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 7/10/17. (lg)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Defendant's MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Rule 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 5/23/17. (lg)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 19 Defendant OCPD's MOTION to Dismiss filed by Oklahoma City Police Department; Oklahoma City Police Department terminated. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 1/28/16. (lg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
