Payn v. Kelley et al
| Ray Wilbur Payn |
| Gerald E Kelley, Gerald E Kelley LLC, James P Kelley, Kelley & Kelley PC, Kelley Kelley & Gregory, Richard C Labarthe, Richard L Andeel, Andeel PC, Board of Directors, Marilyn Kay Payn Ramsey, Edwin Jennings Shapard, Sandra G Shapard, William Shapard, Standley Malaske, Sandra Gales Shapard, Eastwood Development Corp, Wilbur Payn Management Co Inc, Eastgate Company of Oklahoma, Pioneer Pies, Paula Enix, James L Ramsey, Joe L Payn, Paula K Payn, Marilyn K Ramsey, James Lee Ramsey, Joe Leroy Payn, Janice A Doerge and Smokey McKinney |
| 5:2015cv01089 |
| September 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Oklahoma |
| Timothy D. DeGiusti |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER Granting re 82 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Paula Enix, Smokey McKinney, Granting 83 MOTION to Dismiss and Continuing Special Appearance filed by Marilyn Kay Payn Ramsey, Joe Leroy Payn, Marilyn K Rams ey, Richard C Labarthe, Pioneer Pies, Sandra Gales Shapard, Joe L Payn, Edwin Jennings Shapard, Sandra G Shapard, James L Ramsey, James Lee Ramsey, Standley Malaske, Marilyn Ramsey, William Shapard, Granting 80 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Andeel PC, Richard L Andeel, Granting 88 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Janice A Doerge, Denying 115 MOTION for Order filed by Ray Wilbur Payn, Ray Payn, Denying 135 MOTION for Order filed by Ray Wilbur Payn, Ray Payn, Granting 81 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Gerald E Kelley LLC, Kelley & Kelley PC, Kelley Kelley & Gregory, Gerald E Kelley. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 12/29/2016. (mb)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER granting 92 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; granting 95 Motion to Seal Documents. Accordingly, 91 Judgment is VACATED and Plaintiff is granted 21 days to respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. [94-3] and [94-4] are hereby sealed. Plaintiff is directed to file redacted versions of both documents within 7 days. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 5/26/2016. (mb)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER granting 80 Motion to Dismiss; granting 81 Motion to Dismiss; granting 82 Motion to Dismiss; granting 83 Motion to Dismiss; granting 88 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 4/14/2016. (mb)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 47 Motion to Compel; granting 49 Motion to Seal Document and Directing the Filing of Redacted Documents; Striking 22 Exhibit List; Striking 44 Letter; 19 Entry of Appearance is construed to pertain only to Pro Se Plainti ff Ray Wilburn Payn; 4 Entry of Appearance is construed to pertain only to Pro Se Plaintiff Ray Wilburn Payn; Striking 21 Notice of Pendency Action; Striking 45 Notice (No Appearance); Striking 43 Objection to Entry of Appearance; denying 51 Motion to Clarify or Correct Court Record; denying 53 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum; denying 66 Motion to Clarify or Correct Court Record. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 12/14/2015. (mb)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Dismiss; granting 29 Motion to Dismiss; granting 38 Motion to Dismiss; granting 40 Motion to Dismiss; granting 40 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 12/02/2015. (jb)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Dismissing defendant Paula Payn re 23 Letter. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 10/21/2015. (mb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
