Jones v. Bryant
Petitioner: Quentin DeWayne Jones
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Case Number: 5:2015cv01237
Filed: November 5, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Alfalfa
Presiding Judge: Joe Heaton
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 5 of Magistrate Judge Shon Erwin...plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is denied...plaintiff is directed to pay the full $5.00 filing fee within 20 days from entry of this order...absent payment this case will be dismissed. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 04/06/2016. (lam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Quentin DeWayne Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?