McGraw et al v. Oklahoma City City of et al
| Calvin McGraw, G Wayne Marshall, Mark Faulk, Trista Wilson, Neal Schindler, Oklahoma Libertarian Party and Red Dirt Report |
| Oklahoma City City of and William Citty |
| 5:2016cv00352 |
| April 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Oklahoma |
| Joe Heaton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER denying plaintiffs' 106 motion for summary judgment; defendants' motion of summary judgment 98 is granted in part and denied in part; summary judgment is granted in defendants' favor on plaintiffs' facial and as applied void for vagueness claims and plaintiffs' equal protection claims; defendants' motion is otherwise denied; the case will proceed to trial before the court on plaintiff's First Amendment free speech claims and their Fourteenth Amendment liberty claims. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 6/18/2018. (cla)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying plaintiffs' and defendants' motions for partial summary judgment 30 and 31 ; the parties are directed to confer and file, within 14 days, a proposed joint scheduling order governing further proceedings in the case. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 2/6/2017. (cla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
