Madden v. Cleveland County of et al
Plaintiff: Robert Alan Madden
Defendant: Cleveland County of, Inovative Plumbing Design, Andy and Sons Services, Oklahoma State of and Judge Stice
Case Number: 5:2016cv00566
Filed: May 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Cleveland
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Presiding Judge: Gary M. Purcell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendation. Plf's claims against dfts "Cleveland County DA," "Judge Stice," "State of Oklahoma," & "Cleveland County" seeking the dismissal of pndg state criminal charges are DISMISSED w/o PREJUDICE on the bases of failure to exhaust state remedies & abstention. Plf's 42 USC § 1983 claims against dfts "Cleveland County DA" & "Judge Stice" are DISMISSED w/PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 USC  7;§ 1915A & 1915(e)(2)(B) on the ground of absolute immunity. Plf's 42 USC § 1983 claims against dfts "Inovative Plumbing Design" & "Andy and Son's Servies" are DISMISSED w/PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Any claim alleged under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), is also DISMISSED w/PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(e) (2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal of plf's cause of action counts as one "prior occasion" or "strike" pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(g). Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 7/19/2016. (llg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madden v. Cleveland County of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Alan Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cleveland County of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Inovative Plumbing Design
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andy and Sons Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Stice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?