Gerken v. Caddo County Jail
Plaintiff: Jerry Francis Gerken
Defendant: Caddo County Jail
Case Number: 5:2016cv00707
Filed: June 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Caddo
Presiding Judge: Shon T. Erwin
Presiding Judge: Lee R. West
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 and denying 1 Gerken's request for appointment of counsel file-stamped June 23, 2016; and denying 6 Gerken's request for appointment of counsel file-stamped July 29, 2016; and dismisses this matter without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 10/11/2016. (kb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gerken v. Caddo County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Francis Gerken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caddo County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?