Benavidez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Carlos Benavidez |
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas J Scarantino, FNU Burk and FNU Mendez |
5:2016cv00973 |
August 24, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Canadian |
Charles B Goodwin |
Joe Heaton |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 54 of Magistrate Judge Charles Goodwin...plaintiff is ordered to pay the remaining $329.08 balance on his filing fee within 21 days of this order; failue to timely pay the balance of the filing fee will result in this action being dismissed. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 01/02/2018. (lam) |
Filing 52 ORDER. Plaintiff is directed to file a new, complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis no later than October 2, 2017. This application should contain complete answers to all of the questions in the form, including all sources of household income. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B Goodwin on 09/18/2017. (jb) |
Filing 42 ORDER. Plaintiff is ordered to file notice of his current address with the Clerk of the Court no later than August 18, 2017. Plaintiff shall file an updated application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis no later than August 18, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B Goodwin on 07/28/2017. (jb) |
Filing 14 ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE AND SPECIAL REPORT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B Goodwin on 11/08/2016. (jb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.