Jackson v. Bryant
Petitioner: Charles Keith Jackson
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Case Number: 5:2016cv00974
Filed: August 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Alfalfa
Presiding Judge: Charles B Goodwin
Presiding Judge: David L. Russell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Keith Jackson. Having concluded that Petitioners arguments do not establish a right to relief, his petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is also DENIED, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 1/5/18. (jw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Keith Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?