Linzy v. Bryant et al
| Stanley Linzy |
| Jason Bryant and Department of Corrections |
| 5:2016cv01031 |
| September 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Comanche |
| Suzanne Mitchell |
| Lee R. West |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 ; Dismisses without prejudice Linzy's claims against ODOC and his claims for monetary relief against Bryant in his official capacity; agrees amendment should be permitted and re-refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 12-12-2016. (kb)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (1)ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 10] filed on October 28, 2016,to the extent stated: the Court concurs with Magistrate Judge Mitchell's finding that Linzyfailed to pay the initial partial fi ling fee of $17.63 as first ordered, s^ Doc. 6, and at thetime the Report and Recommendation issued, the record did not show any reason whypayment had not been made;(2) because Linzy has now paid the required amount, FINDS that dismissal of thismatter is not now warranted under Rule 41(b), F.R.Civ.P.; and(3) RE-REFERS this action to Magistrate Judge Mitchell for further proceedingsMotions referred to Suzanne Mitchell.. Signed by Honorable Lee R. West on 11/18/16. (ml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
