Nichols v. Chesapeake Operating LLC et al
| Bill G Nichols |
| Chesapeake Operating LLC and Chesapeake Exploration LLC |
| 5:2016cv01073 |
| September 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Beaver |
| Vicki Miles-LaGrange |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER re 78 plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice, deeming proper dismissal on certain curative conditions and granting plaintiff leave to file a motion to withdraw his motion for voluntary dismissal by no later than fou r (4) days from the date of this order; In the event Plaintiff fails to file a motion to withdraw by that deadline, the Court will enter an order granting 78 Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice upon the conditions described (as more fully set out). Signed by Honorable Patrick R Wyrick on 1/21/2020. (ks)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 12 and 25 plaintiff's Motion to Abstain under the Home-State Mandatory Abstention Exception to CAFA and plaintiff's Supplement to His Motion to Abstain under Home State Exception to CAFA (as more fully set out). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 9/13/2017. (ks)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying 11 plaintiff's Motion to Remand (as more fully set out). Signed by Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 2/23/2017. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
