Hall v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Christopher Hall
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number: 5:2016cv01201
Filed: October 17, 2016
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Referring Judge: Gary M. Purcell
Presiding Judge: David L. Russell
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 21, 2017 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 19 Report and Recommendation, as more fully set out. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 7/21/17. (jw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Hall
Represented By: Darcie K Laue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?