Martin v. A-1 Electric Heat and Air et al
| Timothy John Martin |
| A-1 Electric Heat and Air, Carla Nievar and Jonathan Jackson |
| 5:2016cv01348 |
| November 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Oklahoma |
| David L. Russell |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss; denying 26 Plaintiff Joint Motion to Not Dismiss Amended Complaint. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 10/16/17. (jw)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 20 Motion to Dismiss, GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint. Plaintiff is reminded of his obligation to comply with both the rules of this Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs amended complaint shall be filed within ten days of entry of this order. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 8/24/17. (jw)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 8 Report and Recommendation, 7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Timothy John Martin. The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Plaintiffs Amended Mot ion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED. This matter shall be dismissed without further notice unless Plaintiff tenders $400.00 to the Clerk of Court not later than February 3, 2017. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 1/13/17. (jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
