Duvall v. Troutt

Duvall v. Troutt

Plaintiff:	John C Duvall
Defendant:	Jeffrey Coy Troutt
Case Number:	5:2016cv01488
Filed:	December 30, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office:	Oklahoma City Office
County:	Alfalfa
Presiding Judge:	Stephen P. Friot
Presiding Judge:	Bernard M. Jones
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 28, 2017	Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING 10 Report and Recommendation, DENYING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John C Duvall, DENYING 3 Request for Imminent Danger Exception filed by John C Duvall, DENYING 9 Rule 35 Motion for Independent Medical Examination and for the Preservation of Evidence filed by John C Duvall, GRANTING 12 Motion to Withdraw Notice of Appeal filed by John C Duvall. In light of new allegations in the Second Amended Complaint which potentially address the immi nent danger exception, all of these mtns are denied w/o prejudice to consideration de novo, in the event that Mr. Duvall files a new mtn or mtns seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis under the imminent danger exception, citing addl information n ot presented to the magistrate judge in the original mtns. If Mr. Duvall opts to pursue that relief, any such mtns are DUE within 21 days of this date. If no such mtns are filed, this action will be closed at that time & jdgt will be entered based on the findings in this order. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 2/28/2017. (llg) (Main Document 15 replaced on 2/28/2017) (llg).

Date Filed

Document Text

February 28, 2017

Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING 10 Report and Recommendation, DENYING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John C Duvall, DENYING 3 Request for Imminent Danger Exception filed by John C Duvall, DENYING 9 Rule 35 Motion for Independent Medical Examination and for the Preservation of Evidence filed by John C Duvall, GRANTING 12 Motion to Withdraw Notice of Appeal filed by John C Duvall. In light of new allegations in the Second Amended Complaint which potentially address the immi nent danger exception, all of these mtns are denied w/o prejudice to consideration de novo, in the event that Mr. Duvall files a new mtn or mtns seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis under the imminent danger exception, citing addl information n ot presented to the magistrate judge in the original mtns. If Mr. Duvall opts to pursue that relief, any such mtns are DUE within 21 days of this date. If no such mtns are filed, this action will be closed at that time & jdgt will be entered based on the findings in this order. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 2/28/2017. (llg) (Main Document 15 replaced on 2/28/2017) (llg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duvall v. Troutt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John C Duvall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Coy Troutt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?