Thomas et al v. Lester et al
Plaintiff: Robert James Thomas
Defendant: Joseph K Lester, Cleveland County of and Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners
Case Number: 5:2017cv00090
Filed: January 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Cleveland
Presiding Judge: Timothy D. DeGiusti
Presiding Judge: Suzanne Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 131 and granting 120 defendant Todd Gibson's Motion to Dismiss (as more fully set out). Signed by Honorable Patrick R Wyrick on 12/3/2019. (ks)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 91) is ADOPTED in part. Plaintiff's Motion For More Time To Serve Amended Complaint (Dkt. 74) is DENIED and the claims against McSwain and Davis in the 1st Amended Complaint (Dkt. 47) are dismissed wi thout prejudice. Further, Plaintiff's Motion For Leave Of Court To File Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 86) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth in the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 91). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is a gain referred to the Magistrate for preliminary review, for conducting any necessary hearings, including evidentiary hearings, for the entry of appropriate orders as to non- dispositive matters, and for the preparation and submission to the under signed judge of proposed findings of fact and recommendations as to dispositive matters referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). (fully set out in order)denying 74 Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion to Amend/Correct; adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 91 Report and Recommendation.. Signed by Honorable Patrick R Wyrick on 5/24/2019. (sr)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion to Dismiss; adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 62 Report and Recommendation. Case re-referred to Magistrate Judge Mitchell. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 8/17/2018. (mb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas et al v. Lester et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert James Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph K Lester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cleveland County of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?