Gray v. GEO Group Inc Lawton Correctional Facility et al
| Frederick Rideout Gray, Jr |
| GEO Group Inc Lawton Correctional Facility, Joe M Allbaugh, Mark Knutson, Greg Williams, Hector A Rios, Jr, John/Jane Doe, Christina Thomas, Buddy Honaker, FNU Lange, Janna Mergan, FNU Collins, FNU Mecde, FNU Engle, Mike Plume, Jamie Richmand, Sam Musllam, FNU Shah, FNU Simpkins, FNU Juarez, FNU Tunstal, FNU Washington and FNU Black |
| 5:2017cv00137 |
| February 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Comanche |
| Stephen P. Friot |
| Bernard M. Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDER ADOPTING 143 Report and Recommendation. 142 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Frederick Rideout Gray, Jr is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART, as fully set out in this order. This action remains referred to the magistrate judge. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 12/18/2019. (llg)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Report 129 is Accepted, Adopted and Affirmed. As recommended in the Report, defendant Juarez is DISMISSED without prejudice. Motions terminated. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 9/19/2019. (ac)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER ADOPTING 127 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 82 Motion to Dismiss filed by Sgt Clark, FNU Washington, FNU Sattler, M Johnson, GEO Group Inc Lawton Correctional Facility, Hector A Rios, Jr, FNU Brannon, FNU Black, FNU Engle, Latoya Dawson, FNU Tunstal (as fully set out in this order). Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 5/9/2019. (llg)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER ADOPTING 108 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING 70 Motion to Dismiss filed by Mark Knutson, Buddy Honaker. The claims alleged against Knutson in the amended complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice. The claims alleged against Honaker in the amended complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice. This action remains referred to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 4/29/2019. (llg)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER ADOPTING 102 Report and Recommendation, DENYING 85 Motion to Dismiss filed by Christina Thomas, DENYING 86 Motion to Dismiss filed by LPN Walls, DENYING 87 Motion to Dismiss filed by Jamie Richmand, DENYING 88 Motion to Dismiss filed by FNU Simpkins, DENYING 90 Motion to Dismiss filed by FNU Lange, ADOPTING 103 Report and Recommendation, DENYING 89 Motion to Dismiss filed by Sam Musllam (all as fully set out in this order). Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 2/26/2019. (llg)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING 19 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED on screening pursuant to § 1915A(b)(1) and § 1915(e)(2)(B) (all as fully set out in this order). 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Frederick Rideout Gray, Jr is DENIED. 25 Motion to Stay Case filed by Frederick Rideout Gray, Jr is DENIED as moot. 26 Motion to Correct Inadvertant Legal Context Mistakes filed by Frederick Rideout Gray, Jr is DENIED. 27 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Frederick Rideout Gray, Jr is DENIED. 34 Proposed Amended Complaint is STRICKEN. 28 Motion to Appoint Counsel and/or a Guardian Ad Litem filed by Frederick Rideout Gray, Jr is DENIED. 31 Motion for TRO filed by Frederick Rideout Gray, Jr is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 5/11/2017. (llg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
