Duvall v. Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners et al
Plaintiff: John C Duvall
Defendant: Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners and Jeffrey Coy Troutt
Case Number: 5:2017cv00247
Filed: March 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Alfalfa
Presiding Judge: Stephen P. Friot
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER ADOPTING 72 Report and Recommendation, DENYING as moot 37 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by John C Duvall, GRANTING 43 Motion to Dismiss filed by Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners, GRANTING 46 Motion to Dis miss, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jeffrey Coy Troutt, GRANTING 66 Motion to Dismiss filed by Betsy Hormel, DENYING 71 Motion for Imposition of Service Costs Upon Defendant Betsy Hormel filed by John C Duvall, DENYING 78 Motion for Leave to Amend His Complaint and to Add Additional Parties filed by John C Duvall. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 10/15/2018. (llg)
November 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING 24 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING 20 Defendants' Joint Motion to Quash Service of Process, to the extent the mtn seeks to quash plf's 2 certified-mail service attempts of July 2017 (see, doc. nos. 14, 15); DENYING , without prejudice to refiling, 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of 30 Days in Which to Serve and File Proof of Service. Plf is PERMITTED an addl 36 days from the date of this order within which to cause service to be made upon each dft & to ensure that proof of service is filed for each dft. This action is REFERRED BACK to Magistrate Judge Charles B Goodwin for all purposes consistent w/the terms of the original referral. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 11/9/2017. (llg)
June 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE AND SPECIAL REPORT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B Goodwin on 06/26/2017. (jb)
April 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendation; DENYING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John C Duvall, in light of pymt of the filing fee. This matter is RE-REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Charles B Goodwin for all proceedings consistent with the original referral. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 4/14/2017. (llg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duvall v. Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John C Duvall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma State Board of Osteopathic Examiners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Coy Troutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?