Annese v. US Xpress Inc et al
| Andrea T Annese |
| US Xpress Inc and Glenn Anders |
| 5:2017cv00655 |
| June 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Oklahoma |
| Robin J. Cauthron |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 139 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Janine Smedley and 140 Motion to Limit testimony and Opinions of Dr. Stephen B. Conner. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 03/18/19. (wh)
|
|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying part 134 Motion for Order Compelling Discovery. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 03/07/19. (wh)
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 91 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 1/14/19. (wh).
|
|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 90 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Andrea T Annese. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 12/18/18. (wh)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Discovery. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 07/18/18. (wh)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 14 U.S. Xpress's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Plaintiff's Direct Negligence Claims. Signed by Honorable Robin J. Cauthron on 12/28/17. (lg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
