Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Roy Edward Hall
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 5:2017cv00845
Filed: August 8, 2017
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Comanche
Presiding Judge: Suzanne Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 3, 2018 35 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 32 Report and Recommendation, DISMISSING action without prejudice for failure to effect and prove timely service as required by Rules 4(i)(1) and (2), 4(l), and 4(m), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Stephen P. Friot on 5/3/2018. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Edward Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?