Zudell v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
| Forrest Zudell |
| Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Joe Allbaugh, Jeorld Braggs, Jr, Lesia Miser and Shelly Nere |
| 5:2017cv00925 |
| August 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Cleveland |
| Suzanne Mitchell |
| David L. Russell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 45 Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 7/16/18. (jw)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER re 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Forrest Zudell. The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report (Doc. 29) and DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims against the ODOC. Further, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs desired extension to file a more thorough objection because it would be futile; sovereign immunity clearly applies to the ODOC. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 3/22/18. (jw)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER re 5 Letter. Plaintiff's request is premature. If, closer to the September 18, 2017 deadline, the prison has not returned the necessary form to Plaintiff, he may then request an extension of time to cure the deficiency. Signed by Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell on 09/08/2017. (jb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
