Griggs v. Vanguard Group Inc The et al
Jane B Griggs |
Vanguard Group Inc The and Vanguard Marketing Corporation |
5:2017cv01187 |
November 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Oklahoma |
Scott L. Palk |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion to Compel regarding Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notices; granting in part and denying in part 67 Cross-Motion for Protective Order as more fully set forth herein. The respective requests for payment of attorneys' fees are both DENIED. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 6/20/2019. (md) |
Filing 74 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses as more fully set forth herein. Additional discovery responses or document production required by this Order shall be completed by Defendants within 14 days of the filing of this Order. The respective requests for payment of attorneys' fees and costs made by Plaintiff and Defendants are both denied. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 6/18/2019. (md) |
Filing 63 ORDER finding as moot 58 Motion to Strike ; granting 60 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting 60 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 5/28/2019. (md) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.