Benedetti v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Frank Benedetti
Defendant: Schlumberger Technology Corporation, The Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan and The Administrative Committee of the Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan
Case Number: 5:2018cv00614
Filed: June 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Office: Oklahoma City Office
County: Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: David L. Russell
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs claims under section 502(a)(1) are hereby remanded for further consideration. Plaintiffs claim under § 502(a)(3) for br each of fiduciary duty is hereby held in abeyance pending the outcome of the remand proceedings. Defendant is granted summary judgment on Plaintiffs claim for interference under § 510. The Court will administratively close this action pending the termination of remand proceedings. The parties are to inform the Court within sixty days of the termination of such proceedings and the result thereof. Signed by Honorable David L. Russell on 1/6/20. (jw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benedetti v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Benedetti
Represented By: James W Dunham, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Represented By: William W O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan
Represented By: William W O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Administrative Committee of the Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan
Represented By: William W O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?