Gallegos v. County Jail Lincolton Georgia et al
| Eduardo Gallegos |
| Federal Transfer Center, Integris Southwest Medical Center, United States Penitentary, COs, Warden, Michelle Mason-Woodard, United States of America, County Jail McDuffie County, County Jail Lincolton Georgia and Medical Staff |
| 5:2018cv00734 |
| July 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Oklahoma City Office |
| Caddo |
| Shon T Erwin |
| David L Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- it is recommended that the Court should: (1) dismiss, without prejudice, the claims against the United States of America, the FTC, USP-Atlanta, and the official capacity claims for monetary damages against individual Defendants employed by the FTC, for lack of jurisdiction; (2) dismiss, with prejudice, the individual-capacity claims for monetary damages against the individual employee-Defendants of the FTC as untimely; (3) dismiss, without prejudice, the claims against Integris Hospital, for failure to state a claim; and (4) transfer the remainder of the action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues currently referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter. Objections to R&R due by 10/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 9/27/18. (mc) |
| Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
| Filing 8 Receipt for Money Received from Eduardo Gallegos in the amount of $164.08, receipt number OKW500069349 regarding #4 Complaint. Remaining balance is $185.92. Mailed receipt to payor. (nv) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Having reviewed the Motion, the Court finds Plaintiff is entitled to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee. However,Plaintiff shall be required to pay the full $350.00 filing fee as set forth. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before September 11, 2018, Plaintiff pay an initial partial filing fee of $164.08. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 8/22/18. (mc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eduardo Gallegos. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1- Order to Cure Deficiencies, #2 Envelope)(nv) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eduardo Gallegos -- Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies designated by August 27, 2018. See order as more fully set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 8/6/18. (mc)
|
| Docket Annotation: Mailed copies of ]1], #4 and IFP form to Eduardo Gallegos #46274-298 HINTON-CI GREAT PLAINS P O BOX 400 HINTON, OK 73047 (kr) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Eduardo Gallegos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Letter, #2 Affidavit 2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit 3 Claim for Injury, #4 Envelope)(kr) |
| Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE. Case referred to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for all further proceedings. Motions referred to Shon T. Erwin. By the Direction of Honorable David L. Russell on 7/31/18. (kr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eduardo Gallegos. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kr) |
| Filing 1 No Previous Cases. Main Document 1 replaced on 8/1/2018) (kr). Modified on 8/1/2018 (kr). (kr). Modified on 8/1/2018 (kr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
