Duffield v. Bear
Wesley Duffield |
FNU Bear |
5:2018cv00739 |
August 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Cleveland |
Scott L Palk |
Gary M Purcell |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #9 filed by Wesley Duffield. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ac) |
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION : It is recommended that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus RE Doc. #1 be DISMISSED as untimely. Objections to R&R due by 9/19/2018. This Supplemental Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter, and any pending motion not specifically addressed herein is denied.Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 8/30/2018. (cps) |
Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell no longer assigned to case. (cps) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting Report and Recommendations re #6 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 8/28/2018. (md) |
Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell added. (md) |
Filing 7 Receipt for Money Received from Wesley Duffield in the amount of $5.00, receipt number OKW500069079 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Receipt mailed to Wesley Duffield #96668 LEXINGTON-JHCC P O Box 548 Lexington, OK 73051 (ac) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Objections to R&R due by 8/27/2018. It is recommended that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Doc. #5 be DENIED and the action be dismissed without prejudice unless Petitioner pays the full filing fee to the Clerk of the Court by August 23rd, 2018. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter.Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 8/6/2018. (cps) |
Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell no longer assigned to case. (cps) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Wesley Duffield. Motions referred to Gary M. Purcell. (ac) |
Filing 4 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Scott L. Palk on 8/2/2018. (ac) |
Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Scott L. Palk for all further proceedings. Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange no longer assigned to caseEntered at the direction of the Honorable Vicki Miles-LaGrange on 8/2/2018. (ac) |
Filing 2 PREVIOUS Cases (ac) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Wesley Duffield. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Duffield v. Bear | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Wesley Duffield | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: FNU Bear | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.