Hurley v. Lexington Correctional Center et al
Chadd Wayne Hurley |
Lexington Correctional Center and Captain Tullis |
5:2018cv00761 |
August 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
Oklahoma City Office |
Cleveland |
Shon T Erwin |
David L Russell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- it is recommended that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's orders. Objections to R&R due by 9/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 9/11/18. (mc) |
Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin no longer assigned to case. (mc) |
Filing 4 ORDER -- In order for this action to proceed, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 filing fee or be granted leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies designated no later than September 5, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin on 8/15/18. (mc) |
Filing 3 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin. By the Direction of the Honorable David L. Russell on 8/9/18. (kr) |
Filing 2 NO PREVIOUS Cases (kr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lexington Correctional Center, Captain Tullis filed by Chadd Wayne Hurley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.