Wood v. State of Oklahoma et al
| Frank Vincent Wood, III |
| Lonnie Lawson and State of Oklahoma |
| 5:2018cv00818 |
| August 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Scott L Palk |
| Gary M Purcell |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 OBJECTION TO SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #11 filed by Frank Vincent Wood, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Envelope)(ac) |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Frank Vincent Wood, III. It is recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine. Objections to R&R due by 10/16/2018. This Supplemental Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 9/25/18. (rmc) |
| Filing 10 ENTER ORDER stricken as moot #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The Court's records reflect that on September 11, 2018, Petitioner paid the$5 filing fee. Entered by the direction of Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 9/24/18. (rmc) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to pay filing fee by Frank Vincent Wood, III. Motions referred to Gary M. Purcell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ac) |
Filing 8
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting Report and Recommendations re #6 Report and Recommendation.. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 9/14/2018. (md)
|
| Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell added. (md) |
| Filing 7 Receipt for Money Received from Frank Vincent Wood, III in the amount of $5.00, receipt number OKW500069513 regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ac) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the motion for leave toproceed in forma pauperis RE: Doc. #3 be DENIED and the action be dismissed without prejudice unless Petitioner pays the full filing fee to the Clerk of the Court by September 13th, 2018. Objections to R&R due by 9/13/2018. This Report and Recommendation disposes of all issues referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge in the captioned matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on 8/24/2018. (cps) |
| Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell no longer assigned to case. (cps) |
| Filing 5 ENTER ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for all further proceedings. Motions referred to Gary M. Purcell. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 8/23/2018. (ac) |
| Filing 4 NO PREVIOUS Cases (ac) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frank Vincent Wood, III. (ac) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Frank Vincent Wood, III. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-Order Denying Application for Post-Conviction Relief, #2 Attachment B-Order Affirming Denial of Post-Conviction Relief, #3 Attachment C-Probable Cause Affidavit, #4 Attachment D-Petition for Protective Order, #5 Attachment E-Plea of Guilty, #6 Attachment F-Plea of Guilt, #7 Attachment G-Letter, #8 Attachment H-Letter from Lynn Lofits, #9 Attachment I-Exhibits from State court, #10 Attachment M-Transcripts)(ac) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Frank Vincent Wood, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
