Crawford v. Express Services Inc et al
| Geraldina Crawford |
| Express Services Inc and Aecom Technical Services Inc |
| 5:2018cv01127 |
| November 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma |
| Scott L Palk |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 STATUS/SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DOCKET: Scheduling Conference set for 2/28/2019 10:00 AM in Chambers before Honorable Scott L. Palk. Status Report due by 2/21/2019. (md) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Defendant Express Services by Geraldina Crawford. (Roper, Leah) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Aecom Technical Services Inc.(Albert, Victor) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Aecom Technical Services Inc answer due 12/21/2018.. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 12/7/2018. (md)
|
| Filing 15 SECOND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Aecom Technical Services Inc. (Albert, Victor) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Express Services Inc answer due 12/14/2018.. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 11/30/2018. (md)
|
| Filing 13 SECOND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Express Services Inc. (Thrutchley, Christopher) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Aecom Technical Services Inc answer due 12/7/2018.. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 11/26/2018. (md)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Express Services Inc answer due 11/30/2018.. Signed by Honorable Scott L. Palk on 11/26/2018. (md)
|
| Filing 10 FIRST MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Express Services Inc. (Thrutchley, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Ellen A Adams on behalf of Express Services Inc (Adams, Ellen) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Christopher S Thrutchley on behalf of Express Services Inc (Thrutchley, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Defendant AECOM Technical Services, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for a Two-Week Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Petition by Aecom Technical Services Inc. (Albert, Victor) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Victor F Albert on behalf of Aecom Technical Services Inc (Albert, Victor) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Justin P Grose on behalf of Aecom Technical Services Inc (Grose, Justin) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by D Colby Addison on behalf of Geraldina Crawford (Addison, D) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Geraldina Crawford. (Roper, Leah) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Leah M Roper on behalf of Geraldina Crawford (Roper, Leah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Oklahoma County, case number CJ-2018-5589 filed by Aecom Technical Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Docket Report, #2 Exhibit 2 - Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 - Summons, #4 Exhibit 4 - EOA - Colby Addison, #5 Exhibit 5 - EOA- Leah Roper, #6 Exhibit 6 - Return of Service - Express, #7 Exhibit 7 - Return of Service - AECOM, #8 Exhibit 8 - State Court Notice, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(ac) |
| PAYMENT FOR A CIVIL CASE Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1087-2813391. (Albert, Victor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
